Some Thoughts on Sproul Jr.’s Public Confession

Typically, Presbyterians keep their opinion of pastors to themselves, unless the matter is serious enough to warrant public attention. Often that means something chargeable, which would mean bringing the charge to the governing body over the pastor, his Presbytery.

Which is to say that I am not attempting a trial of R. C. Sproul Jr. His Presbytery did that. And Ligonier as well.

At least, that was what I recently discovered at a Christian news site.

But he is a public figure and I can evaluate his public statement and his public actions.

Back in early October, I noted some concerns. There were questions I had about what happened and the confession offered by Sproul Jr.

For instance, consider the manner of the public confession. It was odd. Instead of a straight-forward “I broke the Seventh Commandment by signing up with Ashley Madison,” readers are given this:

“The message of God’s prophets in the Old Testament amounted to this- God is not pleased with what you are doing. Repent…”—with another six lines before he admits to sin.

Next, the admission is ensconced in questionable language: “in a moment of weakness, pain, and from an unhealthy curiosity.”

When publicly admitting sin, adding word such as “weakness,” “pain,” and the like are not helpful. They actually “poison the well” of the confession by attempting to predispose the reader toward sympathy. One’s weakness or pain is irrelevant to the sin and, therefore, to the confession of sin.

More importantly, another observation struck me: he never publicly confessed his sin of deception.

What do I mean by that? Twice he wrote about the Ashley Madison scandal and Josh Duggar in particular before he confessed his sin: Hacking Ashley Madison (July, 2015) and Ask R.C.: How Should We Respond to the Recent Scandal Regarding Josh Duggar? (August, 2015) [recall that Duggar was outed at Ashley Madison].

To his credit, he amended these articles with the following statement: “August 31, 2015 Update to This Article: in light of my public statement here, I believe I should have withheld comment on this matter.”

Certainly we all sin and so when we write or speak we could be accused of hypocrisy by a quick-minded audience. But in this case, Sproul Jr. specified the first article that he had never heard of Ashely Madison: “a website that I only recently learned about.”

He knew about it almost a year earlier. He should confess this lie.

And no one would know that he claimed ignorance of Ashley Madison unless they read that article. Being the research geek that I am, I discovered both articles shortly after the confession.

Why am I writing about this now? Because others have asked me to write about it. Because I discovered someone else recently writing about it. But not because I relish in “taking down” Sproul Jr.

He is a public figure like Bill Gothard and Doug Phillips. Yet his confessed sin is not on par with Doug’s sin. But the Phillips’ incident showed a strong propensity for American homeschooling Christians to fall under the siren call of the cult of personality.

So pointing out a glaring fault in Sproul’s confession is a reminder to pay attention to public figures. They influence people beyond the power of the ordinary pastor. Yet they should be held by the same standards as other pastors.

But even so,  we do not know all that is going on “behind the scenes.” Part of that is because we are not part his ministerial life nor an authority over him.  Because of that we ought to be careful in our discussions on the matter.

But this does not mean we have to be completely silent either. It is significant to note that Sproul’s (incomplete) confession was sufficient enough for Ligonier to reference it as reason for his ten-month suspension (although missing on this page).

But is a ten-month suspension enough? It is hard to determine but I believe Ephesians 5:3 gives a clue:  “But fornication and all [sexual] uncleanness or covetousness, let it not even be named among you, as is fitting for saints.” This is especially true for church officers (1 Tim. 3:7).

In light of all this, we ought to continue to pray for him and those around him. We ought to pray for full repentance and proof thereof. We ought to pray that Ligonier and the Presbytery would treat him no different than any other pastor. And we ought to humbly petition our Lord to protect us from our own follies.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestmail

2 thoughts on “Some Thoughts on Sproul Jr.’s Public Confession

  • April 27, 2016 at 1:23 pm
    Permalink

    Pastor Mathis, it seems more than apparent that both Ligonier and Sproul Jr’s presbytery were involved in a cover up. Both failed to mention anything whatsoever about his alleged suspension. I say “alleged” because they left it entirely up to him to announce it, which is certainly one of the most novel “suspensions” I’ve ever come across. Ligonier’s web site gave no specifics, leaving it to their donors to assume he was still on staff. The CPC also made no mention of it either. As a matter of fact the two CPC churches where he pastors continued listing him as a pastor. Only after Detwiler applied considerable pressure did they finally make some web site revisions, and that took months.

    Then there’s the matter of what even constitutes a suspension: “But is a ten-month suspension enough?” I think a better question would be to ask if he was even suspended at all. What exactly does a suspension entail? Is it not intended as a punishment to bring about humbling, contrition, soul searching, etc.? Given that he was suspended with pay (to the tune of a six-figure income), all at the expense of Ligonier Ministry donors, I can’t help but see his so-called “suspension” as a reward — a ten month paid vacation.

    I quite agree with you: “We ought to pray for full repentance and proof thereof.” Sproul Jr’s “confession” was a sham. He covered up the truth. He made excuses for himself. He told numerous lies. He only outed himself after his Ashley Madison account had been made public. These are not the actions of a repentant man. Come July 1 he’ll be “restored,” even though he’s shown forth none of the fruits of repentance (Matt 3:8). His example to the body of Christ has been atrocious and, I fear, it’s an example that other ordained ministers will be tempted to follow. From all appearances his presbytery, as well as Ligonier Ministries, is just fine with that.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *